You need Adobe Reader 7.0 or later in order to read PDF files on this site.
If Adobe Reader is not installed on your computer, click the button below and go to the download site.

Feature Articles: Optical Node and Switch Technologies for Implementing Flexible and Economical Networks

Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 48–52, Jan. 2014. https://doi.org/10.53829/ntr201401fa8

Multicast Switch Technology that Enhances ROADM Operability

Toshio Watanabe, Kenya Suzuki, and Tetsuo Takahashi

Abstract

A multicast switch is a compact and cost-effective optical switch that realizes a colorless, directionless, and contentionless function and enhances the operability of a multi-degree reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer. This article describes the circuit configuration and characteristics of the multicast switch, which employs a silica-based planar lightwave circuit.

Keywords: ROADM, optical switch, PLC

1. Overview of CDC function

A colorless, directionless, and contentionless (CDC) function enables us to connect optical add/drop signals at any wavelength and from/to any direction in a multi-degree reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer (ROADM) to local transponders without any signal contention. ROADM systems are advantageous in that wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) optical signals can be routed individually without optical-electrical conversion, and they have been evolving from ring to multi-degree ROADM systems. A multi-degree ROADM can select wavelength-by-wavelength whether an incoming WDM signal from any direction will pass through the node and continue in any direction or will be added/dropped at the local node. However, in a conventional ROADM, the wavelength and direction of the optical add/drop signals are assigned in terms of the port to which they are connected, and this makes it necessary to reconnect optical fibers to transponders manually. A multi-degree ROADM with a CDC function that makes it possible to connect optical signals with any wavelength in any direction to any transponder enhances system operability and enables us to construct more flexible and reliable networks.

2. TPA using multicast switch

To realize the CDC function, an optical switch that can assign any wavelength and any direction to each transponder must be employed between the add/drop ports and the transponders. This switch is called a transponder aggregator (TPA). An N × M TPA is required on both the drop and add sides; here, N is the number of input/output routes, and M is the number of transponders. In the TPA, WDM signals are incoming from or outgoing to the ROADM, while a single wavelength is received from or sent to the transponders. On the drop side, the capability to connect different wavelength signals from the same direction to different transponders is required, while on the add side, the capability to launch different wavelength signals from different transponders in the same direction is required.

Among TPA configurations, the multicast switch offers a compact and cost-effective TPA. The TPA architecture that employs a multicast switch is shown in Fig. 1. In a multicast switch on the drop side, WDM signals from each direction are broadcast by a 1 × M splitter, and the signals from the desired incoming fiber are selected by an N × 1 optical switch. A WDM signal at the desired wavelength is extracted by a tunable filter, and then the selected signal is received by the transponder. This architecture enables us to select an optical signal at any wavelength from any direction. The same wavelength signals from other input directions are rejected by the optical switch, which eliminates any signal contention in the TPA.

Fig. 1. TPA architecture employing multicast switch.

On the add side, the output signals from the transponders are routed to a desired outgoing fiber by a 1 × N switch array, combined with different wavelengths by an M × 1 coupler, and then launched into the add ports of the ROADM. This architecture enables us to send an optical signal at any wavelength in any output direction.

The advantage of a TPA using a multicast switch is that it is composed of compact optical components including optical splitters and switches. This is unlike a TPA, which uses a wavelength selective switch (WSS) or a large matrix switch. Although a multicast switch has an intrinsic splitting loss because it includes an optical splitter, we can compensate for this loss with an optical amplifier. A multicast switch based TPA also has the advantage that its switch scale can be expanded by cascading optical splitters when the number of transponders increases. Thus, it is suitable for multi-degree ROADMs that have a small number of add/drop signals.

3. Multicast switch using PLC

3.1 Circuit configuration

An optical switch using a silica-based planar lightwave circuit (PLC) is operated by the thermo-optic effect of silica-on-silicon waveguides. It offers good reliability and mass producibility because it has no moving parts, and many chips can be fabricated simultaneously in wafer processing [1]. Another advantage is that many functional elements can be integrated, thus making it suitable for constructing a multicast switch.

As shown in Fig. 1, the TPAs on both the drop and add sides comprise N units of 1 × M splitters (or M × 1 couplers) and M units of 1 × N switches that are interconnected, and they are identical except for the tunable filters on the drop side. This architecture is the same as that of an optical switch used for photonic transport systems [2], and an 8 × 8 switch was fabricated using a PLC. However, the conventional switch comprises 8-arrayed 1 × 8 switches and 8-arrayed 8 × 1 couplers, and those chips are separated and connected via a 64-fiber circuit sheet as shown in Fig. 2(a) to avoid having too many waveguide crossings on a PLC chip. They were packaged into a 240 mm × 95 mm × 12.5 mm module [3]. We recently developed a new circuit configuration that integrates the splitter and switch [4], as shown in Fig. 2(b). The 8-arrayed 1 × 8 switch comprises eight 1 × 2 switch elements cascaded serially, with a gate switch placed after each 1 × 2 switch element. We divided the 8 × 1 coupler into 2 × 1 elements, and placed them between the stages of the switch elements. This new circuit configuration reduces the maximum number of waveguide crossings by three fourths, and establishes an even number of them between the paths. This allows single chip integration of the 8 × 8 multicast switch and makes it possible to eliminate the fiber circuit sheet, which reduces the size of the optical switch module as described below.

Fig. 2. (a) Conventional and (b) new circuit configuration of PLC-based multicast switch.

3.2 Fabricated PLC

We fabricated an 8 × 8 multicast switch using a PLC based on the architecture shown in Fig. 2(b). The 1 × 2 and gate switch elements are based on a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a path difference of half a wavelength between its arms. When we activate a thermo-optic phase shifter, optical outputs between the two ports are switched in 2 ms [1]. The fabricated chip and module are shown in Fig. 3. The chip is 110 mm × 15 mm, and the fiber pig-tailed module is 150 mm × 45 mm × 13 mm, which is one third the size of the conventional module.

Fig. 3. Fabricated chip and module.

3.3 Optical performance

The measured performance of the multicast switch is shown in Fig. 4. The average insertion loss of the switch was 11.9 dB with a maximum value of 12.0 dB. This is the same as that of a conventional switch using a fiber circuit sheet. The loss includes an intrinsic splitting loss of 9 dB and an excess loss of 3 dB. The waveguide crossing induced loss was estimated to be 1 dB. The average and maximum polarization dependent losses (PDL) were 0.13 and 0.22 dB, respectively. The average wavelength dependent loss (WDL) between 1530 and 1570 nm was 0.66 dB, and the maximum value was 1.10 dB. The average and minimum off-state losses were 62.6 and 42.4 dB, respectively. We employed heat-insulating grooves to reduce power consumption. The average electrical switching power was 0.2 W per path, and the total power consumption was 1.6 W. This performance is satisfactory for practical applications.

Fig. 4. Measured performance of multicast switch.

We also fabricated an 8 × 12 multicast switch based on the circuit configuration [5]. The average and maximum insertion losses of the 8 × 12 multicast switches were 14.1 and 14.5 dB, respectively, including an intrinsic splitting loss of 10.8 dB. The PDL was less than 0.2 dB. The average WDL between 1530 and 1570 nm was only 0.1 dB, and the maximum value was 0.3 dB. The average extinction ratio between the on and off states was 59.2 dB, and the minimum value was 45.4 dB. These results indicate the good scalability of the PLC-based multicast switch.

4. Conclusion

We described the circuit configuration and the performance of an N × M multicast switch that integrates 1 × M splitters and 1 × N switches into a single PLC chip. This PLC-based multicast switch enables us to realize a multi-degree ROADM with a CDC function cost effectively and with a small footprint. We plan to reduce the power consumption further and enhance the optical performance of the PLC-based multicast switch.

References

[1]	H. Takahashi, T. Watanabe, T. Goh, S. Sohma, and T. Takahashi, “PLC Optical Switch that Enhances the Optical Communication Network,” NTT Technical Review, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 17–21, 2005. https://www.ntt-review.jp/archive/ntttechnical.php?contents=ntr200507017.pdf
[2]	M. Koga, T. Kawai, Y. Hamazumi, and N. Takachio, “Photonic Transport System,” NTT Review, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 42–49, 2000 (in Japanese).
[3]	H. Takahashi, T. Watanabe, M. Okuno, Y. Hibino, and T. Goh, “Silica-waveguide-based optical switches for photonic networks,” Technical Report of IEICE, CS2003-9, Vol. 103, No. 68, pp. 1–6, 2003 (in Japanese).
[4]	T. Watanabe, K. Suzuki, T. Goh, K. Hattori, A. Mori, T. Takahashi, T. Sakamoto, K. Morita, S. Sohma, and S. Kamei, “Compact PLC-based transponder aggregator for colorless and directionless ROADM,” Proc. of the OFC/NFOEC 2011, Paper OTuD3, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
[5]	T. Watanabe, K. Suzuki, and T. Takahashi, “Silica-based PLC transponder aggregators for colorless, directionless, and contentionless ROADM,” Proc. of the OFC/NFOEC 2012, Paper OTh3D.1, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

	Toshio Watanabe Senior Research Engineer, Photonics Integration Laboratory, NTT Photonics Laboratories. He received the B.E., M.E., and Dr.Eng. degrees in organic and polymeric materials engineering from Tokyo Institute of Technology in 1990, 1992, and 2001, respectively. In 1992, he joined NTT Opto-electronics Laboratories, where he engaged in research on polymeric materials for optical waveguides. From 1997 to 1999, he was with NTT Optical Network Systems Laboratories, where he researched photonic network systems. From 1999 to 2005, he was involved in developing silica-based planar lightwave circuit (PLC) optical switches. From 2005 to 2008, he was with NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories, where he worked on the development of WDM systems. Since 2008, he has been with NTT Photonics Laboratories, where he is researching photonic node devices. He received the Microoptics Conference (MOC) Paper Award in 2011. He is a member of the Japan Society of Applied Physics.
	Kenya Suzuki Senior Research Engineer, Photonics Integration Laboratory, NTT Photonics Laboratories. He received the B.E. and M.E. degrees in electrical engineering and the Dr.Eng. degree in electronic engineering from the University of Tokyo in 1995, 1997, and 2000, respectively. He joined NTT in 2000. From September 2004 to September 2005, he was a Visiting Scientist at the Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. From 2008 to 2010, he was with NTT Electronics Corporation, where he engaged in the development and commercialization of silica-based waveguide devices. His current research interests are optical circuit design and optical signal processing. He received the Young Engineer Award from the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers (IEICE) in 2003. He is a member of IEICE.
	Tetsuo Takahashi Senior Research Engineer, Supervisor, Group Leader of Intelligent Photonic Node Device Research Group, Photonic Integration Laboratory, NTT Photonics Laboratories. He received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in physics from the University of Tokyo in 1989 and 1991, respectively. In 1991, he joined NTT Transmission Systems Laboratories and engaged in R&D of high-speed SDH ring systems and wavelength division multiplexing systems. Since the early 2000s, he has been engaged in R&D of photonic network systems, especially the development of ROADM systems and related subsystems. He received the NTT Presidential Award in both 2000 and 2005. He is a member of IEICE.

↑ TOP